<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thomas Rayner Associates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomrayner.com.au/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomrayner.com.au</link>
	<description>Web Design Mount Martha</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 05:02:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Article marketing, widgets, footers, themes, etc.</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/article-marketing-widgets-footers-themes-etc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=article-marketing-widgets-footers-themes-etc</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/article-marketing-widgets-footers-themes-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 05:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Webmasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrayner.com.au/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Whenever you get a link from just a WordPress footer or a random footer or, you know, when someone installs a widget, or they install some theme on their content management system, it&#8217;s often the case that they&#8217;re not editorially choosing to a link with that anchor text,&#8221; says Cutts. &#8220;If you write a relatively [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whenever you get a link from just a WordPress footer or a random footer or, you know, when someone installs a widget, or they install some theme on their content management system, it&#8217;s often the case that they&#8217;re not editorially choosing to a link with that anchor text,&#8221; says Cutts.</p>
<p><span id="more-166"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;If you write a relatively low quality article, you know, just a few hundred words, then at the bottom is two or three links of, you know, specifically high keyword density anchor text, then the sort of guy who just wants some content and doesn&#8217;t really care about the quality might grab that article from an article bank or something, and he&#8217;s not really editorially choosing to give that anchor text.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/393nmCYFRtA" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/article-marketing-widgets-footers-themes-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Google ads worth the outlay</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/are-google-ads-worth-the-outlay/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=are-google-ads-worth-the-outlay</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/are-google-ads-worth-the-outlay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrayner.com.au/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re not prepared to spend enough money to gain any effect then you are simply wasting your money. Realistically, if you&#8217;re not spending at least $500 per month on Google AdWords then you&#8217;re probably not serious. Considering a single full page ad in a newspaper could cost you anything from $1,000 (in a regional [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not prepared to spend enough money to gain any effect then you are simply wasting your money.<br />
<span id="more-164"></span><br />
Realistically, if you&#8217;re not spending at least $500 per month on Google AdWords then you&#8217;re probably not serious.</p>
<p>Considering a single full page ad in a newspaper could cost you anything from $1,000 (in a regional location) through to $50,000 (in a major publication), spending a couple of thousand dollars a month on online advertising suddenly starts to make more sense.</p>
<p>Spending $100 a month on Google AdWords is like taking a two-line advert in the classifieds of a country town newspaper you&#8217;re just going to get lost.</p>
<p>In all marketing, a pro-active approach will see you gain much more consistent results as you&#8217;re not waiting for potential customers to find you but ensuring you&#8217;re in front of the target market.</p>
<p>This is true of all media but with so many controls in Google AdWords you really need to be sure that your dollars are being effective.</p>
<p>In terms of gaining traction in the organic search world, I don&#8217;t see that advertising and organic search should be thought of as competitors.</p>
<p>Do the hard yards of strong meta data in ensuring that your site has descriptions, meta tags and all your pictures are rich with keywords in the file named and contain a description within the code.</p>
<p>Ensure you know what you&#8217;re getting for your money and ensure that you give any medium a chance to work.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/are-google-ads-worth-the-outlay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Page Layout Algorithm Update</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/google-page-layout-algorithm-update/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-page-layout-algorithm-update</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/google-page-layout-algorithm-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrayner.com.au/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This algorithmic change does not affect sites who place ads above-the-fold to a normal degree, but affects sites that go much further to load the top of the page with ads to an excessive degree or that make it hard to find the actual original content on the page. If you believe that your website [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This algorithmic change does not affect sites who place ads above-the-fold to a normal degree, but affects sites that go much further to load the top of the page with ads to an excessive degree or that make it hard to find the actual original content on the page.</p>
<p>If you believe that your website has been affected by the page layout algorithm change, consider how your web pages use the area above-the-fold and whether the content on the page is obscured or otherwise hard for users to discern quickly.</p>
<p><a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/page-layout-algorithm-improvement.html">Read more: Page layout algorithm improvement</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/google-page-layout-algorithm-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword Research</title>
		<link>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/keyword-research/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=keyword-research</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/keyword-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomrayner.com.au/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of good keyword research is about being realistic and selecting appropriate keywords for targeting that take into account the site&#8217;s age, current authority and any future optimisation that will take place. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with targeting generic keywords, I&#8217;m simply saying that if your campaign has limited budget and you need results in the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of good keyword research is about being realistic and selecting appropriate keywords for targeting that take into account the site&#8217;s age, current authority and any future optimisation that will take place.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with targeting generic keywords, I&#8217;m simply saying that if your campaign has limited budget and you need results in the short to medium term then targeting less trafficked, less competitive keywords is a much better way to utilise resources.</p>
<p>Lower traffic but lower competition keywords might not seem as exciting to target but if your website can dominate these areas fairly quickly then you are going to see far more traffic from the search engines than failing to effectively target a much more competitive term.</p>
<p>Search volume is of course a very important metric when it comes to keyword research but all too often people make the mistake of looking at broad search volumes rather than the exact match figure when using tools like Google&#8217;s Keyword Tool.</p>
<p>Still, this wouldn&#8217;t prove particularly problematic as this is obviously still a keyword worth targeting – it would knock traffic and ROI projections way off kilter if you do these kinds of things though.</p>
<p>It is widely accepted that Google&#8217;s Keyword Tool isn&#8217;t entirely accurate when it comes to search volumes but using exact match gives you the best data available when assessing how viable a keyword is to target.</p>
<p>I will readily admit that Google is much better at determining that a singular and plural version of a keyword are one and the same, but in many cases there are still differences in the search results.</p>
<p>This one could easily turn into a rant for me because so often I come up against clients who want to rank for [insert trophy keyword] when in actual fact they&#8217;d do better (financially) targeting a different keyword or set of keywords.</p>
<p>If you have goal tracking setup with Google Analytics, you can easily determine the highest converting keywords your site currently gets traffic from, try to identify patterns in your highest converting keywords and then translate and apply this knowledge to other areas of keyword research.</p>
<p>This is yet more rationale to further humanise the keyword research process because most keyword tools struggle to compute words and their meaning in the way a human would.</p>
<p>For example, a searcher looking for &#8216;storage&#8217; could be looking for a self-storage centre, boxes and other storage furniture for the home or even professional storage solutions for a warehouse or office.</p>
<p>Opportunities for confused targeting are abundant which is why it is essential the keywords you decide to target are highly-relevant and laser-focused towards what your business offers.</p>
<p>A good way to do this is to search manually for the keywords in Google and see the kinds of results that come up, you will likely be able to get a feel for whether the keyword is applicable to the product or service you intended to target.</p>
<p>If a marketplace is shifting over time then you would also expect customer search behaviour to develop and evolve over time too – this makes regular keyword reviews essential.</p>
<p>Any time period shorter than this and there is a risk that targeting becomes a bit chaotic with efforts focused on new keywords before results on old keywords have been achieved or evaluated.</p>
<p>Cash cows – the high performing keywords that show little opportunity for growth – look for ways to enhance and maintain performance whilst identifying patterns and translating this learning to other areas or verticals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomrayner.com.au/keyword-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
